For my father, the mere fact that Obama surpassed the primaries and earned the Democratic nomination would have validated years of a harsh life punctuated by racism and prejudice. Obama’s success meant that my father and countless others did not endure social repression in vain. America would finally be able to identify the precise moment that its actions were aligned with its values. Langston Hughes’s cry to let America be America again would not be bastardized for political pursuit but answered with viable reassurance that America may just be America to him – a black man – and to his oppressed brethren of all hues and social castes.

As I sat in my car that breezy November morning, a thickness evaded my throat and a single tear trickled from my eye. I had witnessed and participated in history. Something was different about America that day.
Fast forward almost ten months.
The glorious welcome that greeted President Obama has turned into cautious suspicion. Some citizens feel that he is proposing grandiose legislation and trying to conquer too much in such a brief period of time. Others claim that the president wants to limit our freedoms. Discord on Capitol Hill is overshadowed by protests across the nation, especially in response to President Obama’s healthcare reform. The public outrage frightens me. Literally.
Video footage, newspaper coverage, and blog responses conjure grainy images of America during the Civil War, the civil rights movement, and segregation. In one news broadcast of a town hall meeting in a rural Louisiana parish about healthcare reform, an aging white man struggles to balance himself as he bellows into the microphone, “Tell the president that it will be a cold day in hell before he turns my country into a socialist country!” The audience erupts with applause. Instantly that image was juxtaposed in my mind with a WDSU news reel clip of a white woman voicing her objection to school desegregation in New Orleans. The black and white technology of the day barely conceals her redden face as she explains that white children should stay in their schools and “the blacks” should stay in theirs.
Both images, however, are tamed when compared to pictures of citizens who brandish their weapons while attending healthcare protests. They contend that President Obama’s ideals and political agenda threaten to eradicate our constitutional rights. So, accordingly, they appear at protests with guns, a symbolic reminder of our right to bear arms.
In the modern age of text lingo, I simply reply, “WTF?” What is happening in America? Is President Obama’s mission to provide affordable healthcare to every citizen a socialist ideal or an American value? How does managing healthcare in OUR country equate the removal of constitutional rights? Why, in any situation, would one bring a gun to protest any public official? Should not the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Abraham Lincoln as well as the attempted assassination of Ronald Regan make one weary about using weapons to augment their opinions? Hell, after a reporter assailed President Bush with his shoes, I would rethink wearing anything other than socks. It makes me question the real root of the outrage against President Obama. Is it politically incorrect or keenly observant of me to think that some of the outrage is fueled by racism?
The current outrage focuses on a speech that President Obama plans to give to students of all ages Tuesday, September 8, 2009. According to the media, the speech will encourage students to consider the importance of education. The media have also reported staunch objection to the speech from political organizations and individual citizens.
I read a Yahoo! article dated September 3, 2009, in which the Republican chairman of Florida, Jim Greer, is quoted as saying that the president’s speech forces his ideals and political agenda upon public school students. The district spokeswoman, Katie Gordon, adds that the Republican Party’s main concern is the content of the suggested lesson plans. The article discloses some questions from the lesson plan, which include the following:

• What is the President trying to tell me?
• What is the President asking me to do?
• What resonated with you from President Obama’s speech?
• What is President Obama inspiring you to do?
The article also goes on to quote parents and students. One parent, who is stealthily identified as “justamom,” commented on the Orlando Sentinel’s online coverage of the speech by writing, “I sent my children to school to be educated NOT indoctrinated.”
Again, WTF?
Okay, let us ignore the misuse of the verb “send” and the need for a comma after the word “educated.” The problems with the mother’s response transcend grammar. First, what is the institution of school if not a tool of socialization? We learn how to coexist in school. As an educator, my duties are not limited to teaching academic discourse. Every school, even a public school, is charged with helping students learn how to behave in society. Such social indoctrination is supported with rules and consequences for students who fail to comply. The goal, however, is not to punish students but to illustrate that they must respect themselves and respects others.
Where is justamom when her children and other students across the country recite the “Pledge of Allegiance” every morning? Does she view the traditional proclamation as indoctrination? Guess what? It is. Does anyone recall the tragic, propaganda-filled events that led to the establishment of most of our patriotic songs, proclamations, and other symbolic activities? Research my favorite get-your-act-together-or-else Alejandro O’Reilly from Louisiana history. His actions to regain control in Louisiana earned him the nickname Bloody O’Reilly. Need I comment further? O’Reilly’s actions, my friend, mock of indoctrination.
Second, what constitutes an education? It is impossible to teach science without discussing evolution. It is difficult to cover lessons in social studies and avoid topics such as racism, prejudice, and socioeconomic disparity. In my very own reading and English classes, I have to tackle the meaning of identity; the use of loaded terms like the N-word; and the existence of homosexuality. Even the most generic and watered-down curricula require social contextualization. Children will ask questions. The challenge for parents and administrators is how teachers respond to queries.
In my classroom, we do not avoid uncomfortable discussions. With respectful caution, I accept full responsibility for my lessons and personal comments. My primary goal is to teach students to think critically and draw their own conclusions. From my experience in the classroom, students need an open forum to express themselves without being criticized for their views. To me, it is the teacher’s job to guide students to evaluate those views. Left unchecked, our society will produce students who grow into bitter, blame-seeking adults with no regard for human dignity. To overhaul such outcomes, teachers must be held to high standards and our discussions must be monitored. Now, I know that statement raises innumerable objections and almost contradicts my own stance. Yet, I stand by it. Teachers are human. We make mistakes, and we have the capacity to abuse the platform that our position allows. Nevertheless, the truth of our shortcomings should not prevent important discussions.

Last year, for instance, I had to contain my personal disgust and embarrassment while explaining to an 11-year-old black student why she and her peers should not use the N-word. Ironically, the interesting part of the dialogue was not about the N-word; it was about the B-word. See, the N-word appeared in a novel that the class was reading. I had planned to give my usual lecture on the appreciation of literature and dissuade students from using a word that carries strong connotations and social stigma. I was not prepared when the inquisitive girl raised her hand and said, “But that’s what we are.” The student was noting that black people are, in fact, n-----s. I died a thousand deaths.
In a follow-up discussion between just the student and me, the young girl stated that we – females – were b-----es. For those trying to fill in the dashes, she called women what the dictionary defines as female dogs. Yes, by our very existence, this child contended that women were the B-word. I died a thousand more deaths.
Without judging the student, I calmly explained to her why neither word described either of us. I also noted that we cannot control what others think of us, but we can control to what we answer. We can control how we teach others to treat us. (If the last line sounds vaguely familiar, I got it from one of Maya Angelou’s appearances on Oprah.)
By the end of the school year, the young student had much growth ahead of her, but she had achieved academic and social growth. She believed in herself and her scholastic abilities a little more. I am neither in her home nor in her social circles. I cannot make her understand the gravity of her words and beliefs, but I can encourage her to rethink them. And, when she is ready, I am confident that the young student will view herself, blacks, and black women differently than she did before entering my classroom.
So, back to justamom: what constitutes an education and how is it ever free of indoctrination? More than fifty years ago, formal education suggested that blacks were less than human and women were of a lower caste than men, with white women being the most subservient. To justamom and to others who question the president’s speech to America’s students, I ask for clarification on the so-called indoctrination.
The Yahoo! article that I reference begins with an excerpt from an interview that President Obama gave to a student reporter in August. “I’m going to be making a big speech to young people all across the country,” says the president, “about the importance of education; about the importance of staying in school; how we want to improve our education system and why it’s so important for the country.” Hmm. President Obama wants students to think about the importance of education and improving the educational system in America? Yes, this puts the opposition in perspective. Yeah right. It makes me question the root of the opposition’s perspective.
Again, do some citizens fear the president’s words because of his race? Or is it his former liberal, grassroots initiatives in Chicago as an emerging politician? It cannot be his politics, especially considering the aforementioned quotation. That scares me. Do we have to worry that illogical objection will give way to violence? And, the most baffling aspect of the current outrage against President Obama is that some of his predecessors made similar addresses to America’s youth.
All right. Let us use common sense here. Is Obama the first politician to write a speech geared towards students and encouraging them to stay in school? I do not think so. Should adults watch President Obama’s speech Tuesday and discuss it with their children? Of course, but not because Obama is giving the speech. Parents should watch the speech for the same reason that they should attend parent-teacher conferences, join the PTA, and volunteer in their children’s schools. Parents are the primary educators of their children. No amount of formal schooling, certification, or years of experience exempt teachers from parental critiques. Therefore, parents have an undeniable right to be interested in the speech and its message. And, of course, parents may disagree with the president’s speech, but should they not allow him to make the speech before condemning it and labeling it as indoctrination?
But, I am just a teacher. What do I know, right? Well, I do know that I will download the lesson plans; watch the broadcast with my students; allow them to share their uncensored opinions about the speech; and act as a facilitator of critical thinking. And, for the record, I shall do so without using my personal opinion as a source of indoctrination.
Links
(You can copy and paste the links into your web browser.)
Duncan's Letter:
http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/academic/bts.html
White House Page:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/mediaresources/
Langston Hughes's "Let America Be America Again":
http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15609
Yahoo! Article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20090903/pl_ynews/ynews_pl888
Orlando Sentinel Article:
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_education_edblog/2009/09/president-obama-to-speak-to-students-on-sept-8.html
